Digital Privacy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism

Introduction

Digital privacy, a crucial human right encompassing control over personal information online, faces a threat from surveillance capitalism. Coined by Shoshana Zuboff, surveillance capitalism characterizes the extraction, analysis, and sale of user behavioral data by platforms like Google and Facebook. These platforms exploit user-generated data to create detailed profiles for targeted advertising, infringing on privacy without user consent. Users often lack awareness or control over data collection, impeding their ability to opt-out or manage data usage. This essay aims to evaluate surveillance capitalism’s impact on digital privacy, exploring its benefits, harms, and regulatory challenges, and proposing strategies to fortify digital privacy in this era.

Benefits and Harms of Surveillance Capitalism

Computer security system icons background vector

Surveillance capitalism has both benefits and harms for users and society. On the one hand, surveillance capitalism enables the provision of free or low-cost digital services and platforms that offer convenience, efficiency, and innovation for users. Users can access a variety of information, entertainment, and communication options, and enjoy personalized and customized experiences. Users can also benefit from the feedback, recommendations, and insights that the data analysis can provide, and improve their decision-making, learning, and well-being.

On the other hand, surveillance capitalism undermines the privacy, security, and dignity of users, and exposes them to various risks and harms. Users can lose their privacy, as their data is collected, processed, and used without their consent or knowledge, and as their online activities are monitored, tracked, and recorded. Users can also lose their security, as their data can be breached, hacked, or leaked, and their online activities can be manipulated, influenced, or coerced. Users can also lose their dignity, as their data can be misused, abused, or discriminated against, and as their online activities can be devalued, exploited, or commodified.

Moreover, surveillance capitalism has negative implications for society, as it affects the social, political, and economic spheres. Surveillance capitalism can erode the social fabric, as it can create social inequalities, injustices, and divisions, and it can weaken social trust, cohesion, and solidarity. Surveillance capitalism can also threaten the political system, as it can undermine democratic values, principles, and institutions, and it can enable authoritarian practices, agendas, and actors. Surveillance capitalism can also distort the economic system, as it can create market failures, externalities, and monopolies, and as it can challenge economic rights, interests, and welfare.

Legal and Regulatory Frameworks of Digital Privacy

Digital privacy is regulated by various legal and regulatory frameworks at the international, regional, and national levels. These frameworks aim to protect and promote the right to privacy in the digital context, and to establish the rules and standards for the collection, processing, and use of personal data by digital platforms and actors. Some of the main frameworks are:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), recognizes the right to privacy as a universal human right, and states that “no one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation” (Article 12)
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), binds the state’s parties to respect and ensure the right to privacy, and states that “no one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation” (Article 17)
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), is the comprehensive and harmonized data protection law of the European Union, and it applies to the processing of personal data of individuals in the EU by any entity, regardless of its location. The GDPR grants individuals various rights and protections, such as the right to access, rectify, erase, and port their data, the right to object and restrict the processing of their data, and the right to be informed and give consent for the processing of their data. The GDPR also imposes various obligations and responsibilities on the data controllers and processors, such as the obligation to ensure the lawfulness, fairness, and transparency of the processing, the obligation to implement the data protection principles and safeguards, and the obligation to report and remedy the data breaches and violations⁵.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), is the landmark and comprehensive data privacy law of the state of California, and it applies to the processing of personal information of California residents by any business that meets certain criteria, such as having a certain revenue, data volume, or data sharing activity. The CCPA grants consumers various rights and protections, such as the right to know, access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal information, the right to receive notice and consent for the collection and use of their personal information, and the right to non-discrimination for exercising their rights. The CCPA also imposes various obligations and responsibilities on businesses, such as the obligation to provide notice and transparency about the collection and use of personal information, the obligation to implement data security measures and practices, and the obligation to respond and comply with the consumer requests and complaints.

Gaps and Challenges of Digital Privacy

The existing legal and regulatory frameworks of digital privacy face various gaps and challenges in the age of surveillance capitalism. Some of the main gaps and challenges are:

The lack of global and consistent standards and norms for digital privacy, as different countries and regions have different laws and regulations, and as different digital platforms and actors have different policies and practices. This creates confusion, inconsistency, and uncertainty for users and providers, and hinders the cross-border and cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination for digital privacy.
The lack of effective and enforceable mechanisms and instruments for digital privacy, as the laws and regulations are often outdated, vague, or ambiguous, and as the authorities and agencies are often under-resourced, overburdened, or politicized. This limits the ability and capacity of the regulators and enforcers to monitor, investigate, and sanction the violations and breaches of digital privacy, and to provide remedies and redress for the victims and complainants.
The lack of awareness and empowerment of users for digital privacy, as users are often unaware or uninformed of the extent and implications of the data collection and analysis that occurs behind the scenes of the digital platforms they use, and as users are often unable or unwilling to exercise their rights and choices for digital privacy. This reduces the agency and autonomy of users to control their personal data and communication, and to protect their privacy and security.
The lack of accountability and responsibility of providers for digital privacy, as providers are often opaque or deceptive about the collection and use of personal data, and as providers are often resistant or indifferent to the compliance and adherence to the laws and regulations of digital privacy. This increases the power and influence of providers to exploit and manipulate the personal data and communication of users, and to evade or escape the liability and consequences of their actions.

Recommendations and Suggestions for Digital Privacy

To protect and enhance digital privacy in the age of surveillance capitalism, various actions and measures need to be taken by different stakeholders, such as governments, digital platforms, civil society, and users. Some of the possible recommendations and suggestions are:

To develop and adopt a global and consistent framework and norm for digital privacy, based on the human rights approach and the data protection principles, and to harmonize and align the existing and emerging laws and regulations of digital privacy, and to facilitate the cross-border and cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination for digital privacy.
To strengthen and improve the effective and enforceable mechanisms and instruments for digital privacy, such as the independent and competent authorities and agencies, the adequate and proportional sanctions and penalties, the accessible and expedient remedies and redress, and the transparent and participatory oversight and review.
To increase and promote the awareness and empowerment of users for digital privacy, such as by providing clear and comprehensive information and education, by offering easy and